Leaders, History and Political Science Article Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Leaders, narration and Political Science - Article ExampleThis paper outlines that the world is shifting from gigantic entity where every man was seen as separate to the other into a more interlinked entity through economic globalization and through the regularise of trans content political organization and growth of population. Liberation on the other hand is actually the dividing line of realism in that it sees both articulate and non-state actors as significant. It also views the international associations implications to define the performance non only of great powers but also of minimal powers. According to liberalism, states are disaggregated into entities where some of them functions trans-nationally.This study declares thatwomen are still mistreated in different societies in the world today. Distinctions between individuals with any given state or culture are much superior to differences between groups. Social standing, education, personality, past experience, belief s tructure, eye shown in the home and countless of other factors will influence human behavior and culture. For example in African cultures, women must stay home and perform all the house chores. There was also a belief that if the husband do not beat his wife, then he does not have sex her that much. This inwardness that women were frequently beaten and mistreated without any form of defense because people believed that it was a sign of love therefore, there was no need of intervention. India has the men marrying women but it is interesting to note that it is women who pay dowry kinda of men.... A good example of such is the US policy toward Venezuela. The Venezuela President Chavez was bitter with US referable to their denial to include Venezuela and other countries in America into United States (Restrepo 33). In fact, the whole of Venezuela was bitter and impatient with the US and that contributed to Venezuela president Chavez to make democracy in the estate an intimidating influence to other people. He begun harassing the citizens of the country as a why to show his anger. However, US had to come in, its policy towards Venezuela was that democracy, and the leaders of the country should practice equitability (Shifter 71). In other words, every citizen in the country deserved equitability and democracy not anguish and enslavement. Therefore, it was individual leader President Chavez who determined the content of US foreign policy to Venezuela (Restrepo 64). The same happened to Syria where US policy towards Syria was elimination of Assad from power due to his dictatorship and unusual elimination of citizens particularly the University students who protested for murder of their colleague. However, this grimace was different in that the citizens of Syria back up United States policy over President Assad while in Venezuela the citizens supported President Chavez although he denied them democracy (Shifter 82). 2. Compare and contrast the traditional Real ist view of National Security and the cock-a-hoop view of Human Security. Are these two views always in contradiction to each other or could they be complimentary? In your opinion, which view of security should be paramount? The traditional realist view of national security is that the state is the main actor